Outgoing Edge in the Acyclic Orientation), and the Canonical Ordering for Planar P Long 2 3 F F F

ثبت نشده
چکیده

triangular graphs 7] (in which every vertex v; v 6 = v 1 ; v 2 ; v n , has 2 incoming and 1 outgoing edge in the acyclic orientation). Another observation is that the canonical ordering, presented in section 4, gives a simple algorithm to test whether a planar triangular graph is 4-connected. An interesting research eld is to problem of computing a canonical ordering of a 4-connected planar graph such that v i+1 is a neighbor of v i. This would yield a simple algorithm for constructing hamiltonian circuits in 4-connected triangular planar graphs. We leave this question open for the interested reader. 1 2 low(F) high(F) w w 1 w Figure 7: Example of the proof of Theorem 5.1. path of F 1 , starting with edge (w 1 ; w 2), has length 2. Hence w 2 has an outgoing edge to a node of F 1 , and an outgoing edge to w 3. Thus w 2 = low(F 2), with F 2 = left((w 2 ; w 3)). Repeating this argument it follows that w d?1 = low(F d?1), with F d?1 = left((w d?1 ; w d)). However it is easy to see that w d = high(F d?1). This means that one of the two directed paths of F d?1 has length 1. This contradiction proves the claim. When traversing an edge e of P long , we visit either left(e) or right(e) (or both) for the rst time. We assign each edge e to the face F, with e 2 F, which we visit for the rst time now. G 0 has n ? 2 faces. To every face F of G 0 , by the claim, at most one edge e 2 P long is assigned. Hence the longest path from s to t in G has length n ? 1. 2 Visibility(G) can be applied to a general 4-connected planar graph by rst triangulating it. (The triangulation of a 4-connected planar graph is clearly still 4-connected.) Since the worst-case bounds for visibility representation by applying an arbitrary st-numbering is (2n ? 5) (n ? 1) 9, 11], our algorithm reduces the width of the visibility representation by a factor 2 in the case of 4-connected planar graphs. Maybe this approach can be used to obtain better grid bounds in general, by splitting the graph into 4-connected components. Consider …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Graceful labelings of the generalized Petersen graphs

A graceful labeling of a graph $G=(V,E)$ with $m$ edges is aninjection $f: V(G) rightarrow {0,1,ldots,m}$ such that the resulting edge labelsobtained by $|f(u)-f(v)|$ on every edge $uv$ are pairwise distinct. For natural numbers $n$ and $k$, where $n > 2k$, a generalized Petersengraph $P(n, k)$ is the graph whose vertex set is ${u_1, u_2, cdots, u_n} cup {v_1, v_2, cdots, v_n}$ and its edge set...

متن کامل

On (Semi-) Edge-primality of Graphs

Let $G= (V,E)$ be a $(p,q)$-graph. A bijection $f: Eto{1,2,3,ldots,q }$ is called an edge-prime labeling if for each edge $uv$ in $E$, we have $GCD(f^+(u),f^+(v))=1$ where $f^+(u) = sum_{uwin E} f(uw)$. Moreover, a bijection $f: Eto{1,2,3,ldots,q }$ is called a semi-edge-prime labeling if for each edge $uv$ in $E$, we have $GCD(f^+(u),f^+(v))=1$ or $f^+(u)=f^+(v)$. A graph that admits an  ...

متن کامل

Edge pair sum labeling of some cycle related graphs

Let G be a (p,q) graph. An injective map f : E(G) → {±1,±2,...,±q} is said to be an edge pair sum labeling if the induced vertex function f*: V (G) → Z - {0} defined by f*(v) = ΣP∈Ev f (e) is one-one where Ev denotes the set of edges in G that are incident with a vertex v and f*(V (G)) is either of the form {±k1,±k2,...,±kp/2} or {±k1,±k2,...,±k(p-1)/2} U {±k(p+1)/2} according as p is even or o...

متن کامل

Edge pair sum labeling of spider graph

An injective map f : E(G) → {±1, ±2, · · · , ±q} is said to be an edge pair sum labeling of a graph G(p, q) if the induced vertex function f*: V (G) → Z − {0} defined by f*(v) = (Sigma e∈Ev) f (e) is one-one, where Ev denotes the set of edges in G that are incident with a vetex v and f*(V (G)) is either of the form {±k1, ±k2, · · · , ±kp/2} or {±k1, ±k2, · · · , ±k(p−1)/2} U {k(p+1)/2} accordin...

متن کامل

On the signed Roman edge k-domination in graphs

Let $kgeq 1$ be an integer, and $G=(V,E)$ be a finite and simplegraph. The closed neighborhood $N_G[e]$ of an edge $e$ in a graph$G$ is the set consisting of $e$ and all edges having a commonend-vertex with $e$. A signed Roman edge $k$-dominating function(SREkDF) on a graph $G$ is a function $f:E rightarrow{-1,1,2}$ satisfying the conditions that (i) for every edge $e$of $G$, $sum _{xin N[e]} f...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1992